Persuasive Essay on Nuclear Power Example - HelpMe™

 

essay nuclear energy

The two incidents, while completely unrelated sent the majority into a whirl of panic and without a real understanding of how nuclear energy works most backed away from the possibility of using nuclear power as an energy resource. Unfortunately, as in the case when the masses are ignorant of the facts, valuable assets are often overlooked. But seriously, I can give many reasons to be opposed to nuclear power. But in a persuasive essay, you have to consider both sides. So let’s look at the reasons why some people believe nuclear power is a good solution to the growing need for energy. Reasons for nuclear power. Nuclear power creates no greenhouse gasses. To write a nuclear energy essay may appear daunting because it involves knowledge of quantum of Physics. However this may not be the case. It has to incorporate many issues- the world’s energy problem, pollution problem caused by fossil fuel and the like. Let us analyze what all facts and arguments a good nuclear energy.


Nuclear Energy Essay Sample - JetWriters


Ever since humanity has existed, essay nuclear energy, there has been an increasing demand for energy as a means of survival, from its usage for cooking and warmth, all the way to electricity generation for production and agricultural activities.

With the increase of population comes the increase in demand for energy. The two criteria for sustainability are efficiency and renewability, both of which are fulfilled by nuclear power. Nuclear energy is much more environmentally friendly and humanly safe than fossil fuels. It also provides us with the energy security we need; thus, essay nuclear energy, it should be adopted as the future power supplier in all countries.

Environmental safety is one of the major essay nuclear energy why scientists are reverting to sources other than fossil fuels and developing nuclear technology that would reduce the amounts of all the gaseous, solid and essay nuclear energy wastes produced by fossil fueled plants. Those wastes are resulting in serious environmental crises. Unlike the fossil fuels, essay nuclear energy, nuclear fuel is smoke free; thus, protecting the environment from the serious implications of the gaseous residuals like Carbon Dioxide CO2Sulfur dioxide SO2 and nitrogen oxides that are major contributors to global warming, acidic rain and smog, essay nuclear energy, respectively.

Global warming causes the melting of huge ice fields such as the ones covering Greenland and Antarctic, consequently inundating so many coastal areas with water Morris, With the acidic rain, ecological problems will arise, manifested in the destruction of trees and death of fish Morris, On the other hand, essay nuclear energy from the gaseous waste, there exists the solid and liquid waste of fossil fueled plants in the form of ashes from coal plants and crude oil waste from oil plants.

Just like the solid waste, liquid waste of essay nuclear energy plants could also be spilled into the ocean while being moved from one area to another for disposal, resulting in the termination of aquatic life Morris, essay nuclear energy, Such incidents are unbearable, yet they happen. However, nuclear plants have no gaseous waste. As to the solid wastes, scientists have developed an efficient way to dispose safely of them. It is proposed that the radioactive waste should be mixed with molten glass then cooled to be part of solid, corrosion-proof glass; thus, blocking its radioactivity Morris, While the fossil fuels waste would continuously pose a threat the environment and to human health.

Those fossil fuels do not only harm the environment, but also violate human safety, by producing pollutants that cause serious diseases.

All of which have been linked to serious neuromuscular and respiratory diseases, like bronchitis and lung-cancer. On the other hand nuclear energy is free of all those pollutants. On the long run, essay nuclear energy how many lives would be saved by just replacing fossil fuels with nuclear energy. Opponents of nuclear energy have been promoting nuclear energy for years to be a death tool; in fact, this claim has little truth to it.

One is much more essay nuclear energy to death from air pollution, than of the radiation emitted by the essay nuclear energy plants.

Air pollution causes deaths worldwide every year Morris, When, essay nuclear energy death toll for the Chernobyl accident was cancer deaths over 50 years, which means, deaths per year.

Which confirms the claim that air pollution is much more dangerous than nuclear energy. Nevertheless, the radiation is still the major concern of those in opposition of nuclear energy because it has been publicized that nuclear energy produces excessive amounts of radiation causing three possible health effects: genetic mutations, radiation sickness and cancer. As to the essay nuclear energy mutations, it has been shown that excessive doses of radiation are not associated in any way with the genetic mutations.

This needs a minimum radiation exposure ofmillirems, below that no radiation essay nuclear energy occurred in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nowadays, at the fence line of a nuclear power plant, by law, radiation may not exceed 10 millirems, that is 10, times less than the level at which radiation sickness occurs, it is also a tenth essay nuclear energy the amount of radiation one could get from a medical x-ray yearly.

Actually no one lives this close to a nuclear power plant, therefore, people would get less than 0. The last argued health effect is cancer. It has been proven that no cases of cancer due to radiation occurred at less thanmillirems exposure, essay nuclear energy, which is a huge dose. Back to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki, cases of cancer occurred in a carefully studied group of 80, Japanese people who were exposed to overmillirems of radiation, that is 0.

Thus if we were to draw a conclusion from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it will be that 0. And since the major concern is eliminated, essay nuclear energy, then why not use what is considered an efficient power source that would supply us with sufficient energy? Studies show that uranium reserve in our planet earth will be sufficient to contribute to the energy production for years from now. Not only do we have an abundance of uranium for energy production, but also uranium is the most eligible, among other sources of energy, for long-term storage.

For example, a MWe -megawatts of electricity- power plant requires tones of natural uranium annually, which is easily stored, essay nuclear energy. While if it was powered by coal it will require over 3 million tones of coal, that is impractical to store due to dust and visual implications World-Nuclear Association, As one might already know, nuclear power plants produce so much energy with a relatively small amount of fuel as compared to the fossil fuels powered plants.

When comparing the two types of energy, scientists use the term electron volt, that is, the amount of energy an electron acquires while being accelerated by1-volt battery. The energy in a typical chemical bond is several electron volts, whereas the fission of one uranium nucleus releases about million electron volts Ferguson, So nuclear energy is much more productive and efficient than the currently used fossil fuels. After all this, no one has any reason to reject such a clean, safe and efficient energy supply; thus, nuclear energy adoption is imperative for all countries that want to step out of the traditional, outdated and detrimental techniques that have been going on for enough time till now.

And step into a more pioneering and innovative era of clean, sustainable nuclear energy. That would last for enough generations to live without having to essay nuclear energy about the depletion of energy sources. Free essay samples Essays Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Energy 8 August We will write a custom essay sample on. Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Energy — Blessing or Curse?

A limited time offer! A Sample Wanted.

 

Nuclear Energy free essay sample - New York Essays

 

essay nuclear energy

 

The two incidents, while completely unrelated sent the majority into a whirl of panic and without a real understanding of how nuclear energy works most backed away from the possibility of using nuclear power as an energy resource. Unfortunately, as in the case when the masses are ignorant of the facts, valuable assets are often overlooked. On the other hand nuclear energy is free of all those pollutants. On the long run, imagine how many lives would be saved by just replacing fossil fuels with nuclear energy. Opponents of nuclear energy have been promoting nuclear energy for years to be a death tool; in fact, this claim has little truth to it. Nuclear energy Nuclear Power and its uses is a growing discussion in today’s era of technology. Australia is one of the developed countries where the demands of energy resources are increasing rapidly. Nuclear energy is coming up as a great alternative, but various factors support as well as oppose its growth.